Case Chronicle

The point is to make a record that is already public, readable.

The cases

Every case on the shelf gets the same treatment: a chronology, a map of how the thing resolves, and a note on where the record ends and what it leaves out.

Prosecutor v. Duterte South Africa v. Israel United States v. Combs United States v. Google TikTok v. Garland

About

How these are built, and what they are not

Source

Public filings only: dockets, exhibits and signed orders, as archived from PACER or the court’s own system. Every characterization on a case page traces to one of them, and the citation is on the card that makes it.

Order

Chronological, not thematic. A docket is a stack sorted by filing date, which is the one order in which none of it makes sense. These pages re-sort it into the order the events happened.

Both sides

Positions appear as each side actually argued them in its own filings, not as the other side characterized them. Where a side’s argument has a weak point, the weak point is marked.

What this is not

Not legal advice, not a finding, and not a verdict. Allegations are allegations. Where a court has not resolved something, these pages say so and stop.